Chris Webb's BI Blog

Analysis Services, MDX, PowerPivot, DAX and anything BI-related

Archive for the ‘Excel’ Category

Working With Excel Named Ranges In Power Query

with 24 comments

One of the more recent additions to Power Query is the ability to access data from named ranges in the Excel worksheet rather than an Excel table. I’ve got used to formatting data as tables in Excel because that’s what Power Pivot needs to import data directly from the worksheet, but if you are working with Power Query and a pre-existing workbook then trying to reformat data as tables can be a pain. Also, if you just want to import a single value, for example as a parameter to a query, a table seems like overkill.

(Incidentally, if you’re wondering what a named range is in Excel, there are tons of good introductions to the subject on the internet like this one. You can do loads of cool stuff with them.)

Consider the following Excel worksheet:

image

There are three named ranges here: FirstRange, SecondRange, ThirdRange, and the values in the cells show which range the cells are in. FirstRange consists of two cells in two columns; SecondRange consists of three cells in a single row; and ThirdRange is consists of three, non-contiguous cells. (You can also use this trick to display the names of all contiguous ranges in an Excel workbook, but alas it does seem to work for non-contiguous ranges).

At the moment, the Power Query ribbon doesn’t make it obvious that you can use named ranges as data sources. However you can see all the tables and cells in a worksheet, and even return that list from a query, by creating a blank query and using the expression

= Excel.CurrentWorkbook()

image

Once you’ve done this you can see all the ranges (and also any tables) in the workbook, and click on the table link next to the name to see the data. For example, clicking on FirstRange shows the following table in a new step in the query editor:

image

The expression to get at this table in a single step is:

= Excel.CurrentWorkbook(){[Name="FirstRange"]}[Content]

The range SecondRange in my example is equally straightforward to reference, and you can see its contents by using the expression

= Excel.CurrentWorkbook(){[Name="SecondRange"]}[Content]

image

Unfortunately ThirdRange, which is not contiguous, is a problem: I can only get the first cell in the range. So the expression

= Excel.CurrentWorkbook(){[Name="ThirdRange"]}[Content]

Returns just this table:

image

It would be nice if we could get a list containing the cell values, rather than a table, for ranges like this…

Last thing to mention is that if you do want the value in a cell, rather than a table, you just need to right-click inside the cell in the Query Editor and select Drill Down:

image

This returns the value (in this case the text “Third Range Cell 1”) in the cell you clicked on:

image

This is a much more useful value to return than a table containing a single row/column, if you intend to use a value from a single cell in a named range as a parameter to another query.

You can download the sample workbook for this post here.

Written by Chris Webb

July 22, 2014 at 9:30 am

Posted in Excel, Power Query

Using Slicer Selections In The CubeSet Function

with 8 comments

I had an interesting challenge from a customer yesterday – one of those problems that I’d known about for a long time but never got round to working out the solution for…

Consider the following PivotTable, based on a PowerPivot model using Adventure Works data, in Excel 2010:

image

It shows the top 10 products by the measure Sum of Sales. There are two slicers, and the top 10 shown in the PivotTable reflects the selections made in the slicers. All of this works fine. But what if you want to use Excel cube functions to do the same thing? You can write the MDX for the top 10 products quite easily and use it in the CubeSet() function in your worksheet, but how can you get your MDX set expression to respect the selection made in the slicers?

The solution to this problem is very similar to the trick I showed here – finding the selected items in a slicer is not easy! Here are the steps I followed to do it:

  • Add the slicers for EnglishOccupation and CalendarYear to a new worksheet
  • Go to Slicer Settings and uncheck the box for “Visually indicate items with no data”
  • Add two new PivotTables to the worksheet. Connect one to the EnglishOccupation slicer and put EnglishOccupation on rows; connect the other to the CalendarYear slicer and put CalendarYear on rows.
  • Use the OLAPPivotTableExtensions add-in (which you can download here) to add new MDX calculated measures to each PivotTable. For the EnglishOccupation PivotTable call the measure SelectedOccupations and use the following MDX:
    SetToStr(Except(Axis(0), {[Customer].[EnglishOccupation].[All]}))
    This expression does the following: it uses the Axis() function to find the set of members selected on what Excel thinks of as the rows axis in the PivotTable (actually the MDX columns axis), then uses Except() to remove the All Member from the hierarchy (which Excel uses for the Grand Totals) and then uses SetToStr() to take that set and return the string representation of it. Do the same thing for the PivotTable showing CalendarYear too, calling the calculated measure SelectedYears; the MDX in this case is:
    SetToStr(Except(Axis(0), {[Date].[CalendarYear].[All]}))
    This is what the EnglishOccupation PivotTable should look like:
    image
  • Next, to make things easy, use Excel formulas to get the values from the top cell inside each PivotTable into cells elsewhere in the worksheet, and give these cells the names SelectedOccupations and SelectedYears.
    image
  • Then enter a CubeSet() function into a new cell using the following formula:
    =CUBESET(
    "PowerPivot Data",
    "Topcount(
    [Product].[EnglishProductName].[EnglishProductName].members,
    10,
    Sum(" & SelectedOccupations & " * " & SelectedYears & ",[Measures].[Sum of Sales])
    )",
    "Top 10 Set")
    What this does is use the TopCount() function to find the top 10 Products, and in the third parameter of this function which is the numeric expression to find the top 10 by, it crossjoins the two sets of selected occupations and selected years and then sums the output of the crossjoin by the measure [Sum of Sales].
  • Last of all, build your report using the Excel cube functions as normal, using the CubeRankedMember() function to get each item from the top 10 set created in the previous step.

image

You can download my sample workbook here.

The bad news about this technique is that it doesn’t work in Excel 2013 and Power Pivot. It’s no longer possible to create MDX calculated measures on Power Pivot models in Excel 2013, alas. It will work if you’re using any version of Excel from 2007 on against Analysis Services and, as I show here, Excel 2010 and PowerPivot. If you are using Power Pivot and Excel 2013 it might be possible to create a DAX measure to do the same as the MDX I’ve used here (I’m wondering if the technique Jason describes here will work). It would certainly be possible to use CubeRankedMember() to find each item selected in the slicer, as Erik Svensen shows here, and then use Excel formulas to find the MDX unique name for each selected member and concatenate these unique names to create the set expression that my calculated measures return, but that’s a topic for another post. This really should be a lot easier than it is…

Written by Chris Webb

June 20, 2014 at 10:59 am

MDX Cell Properties Supported By Excel

with 5 comments

I was wondering the other day (as you do) which of the MDX cell properties Excel PivotTables actually support. This page has all the details on the cell properties that are available in an MDX query but most client tools don’t bother retrieving all of them and Excel is no different. Of course it retrieves the most important properties and it retrieves one or two others, but I couldn’t resist doing a bit of research to find out the exact situation with Excel 2013.

The first thing to note is that you can control which cell properties Excel retrieves for a given connection in the connection properties dialog, in the OLAP Server Formatting section:

image

If you can live with not getting all of the cell properties back from SSAS there are some scenarios where unchecking all of the boxes in the OLAP Server Formatting section can improve performance:

  • When you have a large number of databases and cubes on your server, and/or complex security, because a side effect of the way Excel retrieves properties is that it causes all cubes in all databases to be loaded, their MDX Scripts executed and security evaluated. See here for more details.
  • When your queries return a lot of data and your network is slow. See page 61 of the SQLCAT Guide to BI and Analytics for more details.

You can also quite easily see which cell properties Excel is retrieving by looking at the MDX queries it generates (thank you OLAP PivotTable Extensions). Here’s an example of a simple PivotTable query run on a connection which has all of the boxes checked in the OLAP Server Formatted section:

SELECT 

{[Measures].[D1],[Measures].[D2]} 

DIMENSION PROPERTIES PARENT_UNIQUE_NAME,HIERARCHY_UNIQUE_NAME 

ON COLUMNS  

FROM 

[Adventure Works DW2008] 

CELL PROPERTIES VALUE, FORMAT_STRING, LANGUAGE, BACK_COLOR, FORE_COLOR, FONT_FLAGS

 

In the cell properties clause of this query you can see the six properties returned. Here’s a breakdown of each of them.

VALUE and FORMAT_STRING

Excel doesn’t actually retrieve the FORMATTED_VALUE cell property, which gives you the measure value with formatting applied by SSAS. Instead, assuming you have the Number Format box checked in the Connection Properties dialog, it retrieves the VALUE property from SSAS (which contains the raw, unformatted measure value) and the FORMAT_STRING property (which contains the format string you defined on the server). It then tries to convert the format string into an Excel format for the PivotTable. Unfortunately it can’t always do the conversion successfully – I blogged about a problem with the Percent format some time ago and this is still a problem with Excel 2013. Excel also doesn’t support formats defined in the fourth section (see here for more details) of the FORMAT_STRING property for null values, and there are probably lots of other relatively obscure types of formatting it doesn’t support too.

LANGUAGE

The language property of a cell controls things like the currency symbol displayed when you are using the “Currency” built-in format string and the thousands and decimal separators used. Whether Excel returns the language property or not is also linked to the Number Format checkbox in the Connection Properties dialog. I strongly recommend that you do not use the “Currency” format string and the Language property if you are working with multiple currencies, for reasons I outlined here.

BACK_COLOR and FORE_COLOR

I’ve never particularly liked using the BACK_COLOR and FORE_COLOR properties on a cell to do traffic light-style reporting, to be honest, although I know some people love it. However I do use these properties a lot when debugging scoped assignments as seen here. BACK_COLOR is retrieved if you have the Fill Color box checked on the connection properties dialog; FORE_COLOR is retrieved if you have the Text Color box checked on the connection properties dialog.

FONT_FLAGS

Probably the only surprise of this whole exercise was the fact that Excel retrieved the FONT_FLAGS property if you have the Font Style box checked on the connection properties dialog; alas it doesn’t support FONT_SIZE or FONT_NAME. For example if you put the following calculated members on your cube:

CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.MEASURES.BOLD as "This is BOLD", FONT_FLAGS=1;

 

CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.MEASURES.ITALIC as "This is ITALIC", FONT_FLAGS=2;

 

CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.MEASURES.UNDERLINE as "This is UNDERLINE", FONT_FLAGS=4;

 

CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.MEASURES.STRIKEOUT as "This is STRIKEOUT", FONT_FLAGS=8;

If you drop them into a PivotTable, you will see the following returned:

image

Written by Chris Webb

April 25, 2014 at 11:02 am

Power BI Review, Part 2.5: Q&A (Now I’ve Used It With My Data)

with 6 comments

A few months ago I posted a review of Q&A, the natural language query functionality in Power BI, based on the sample data sets that were then available. Last week, finally, we got the news that we could enable Q&A on our own Power Pivot models, and having played with this new release I thought it was a good idea to post an update to my original thoughts.

The first thing to point out is that even if you’ve got a Power BI Preview tenant you will need the latest version of Power Pivot for Excel to be able to get the best out of Q&A. This latest release contains some new functionality to add ‘Synonyms’ to the model – what this means is that it allows you, as a model creator, to tell Power BI about other names that end users might use when querying your model. For example on a Geography dimension you might have a column called State but if you are a multinational company you may find that while your State column contains the names of states in the USA, it might contain the names of cantons in Switzerland, counties in the UK, departments in France and so on. As a result you will want Power BI to know that if a user asks for sales by county in the UK that it should actually look in the State column. Devin Knight has already written a good post showing how synonyms work with Q&A which you can see here.

Another complication is that, at the time of writing, the Synonym functionality is only available to users who have installed the streamed version of Office 2013 from Office 365. I have an Office 365 subscription but I had installed Office from an msi before that, so I had to uninstall Office and reinstall the streamed version to be able to see Synonyms – I assume that support for Synonyms in the non-streamed version of Excel will come at some point soon in the future, but in general I would expect that new Power BI functionality will appear first in the streamed version of Office first so if you’re serious about BI you should change over to it as soon as you can. Melissa Coates has a lot more detail on this issue here.

But enough about setup, what about Q&A? The data that I tested it on was a model I’ve been using for user group and conference demos for about six months now, which contains data from the UK’s Land Registry and details all residential property transactions in England and Wales in 2013. It’s fairly simple – two tables, a date table and a transactions table containing around 0.5 million rows – so probably a lot simpler than the average Power Pivot model, but nonetheless real data and one which had been polished for demo purposes. The Excel file holding it is around 25MB so I was well within the Power BI file size limits.

My initial impression after I had added my existing model (with no synonyms etc) to Q&A was that while it worked reasonably well, it worked nowhere near as well as the demo models I had seen. I then set about making changes to the model and re-uploading it, and these changes made all the difference. Some examples of the things I did are:

  • Changed table and column names. In my model I had already taken the trouble to make them human readable, but this did not necessarily mean they were suitable for Q&A. For example, my main fact table was called ‘Land Registry’, so at first Q&A kept suggesting questions like “How many land registries were there in June…” which clearly makes no sense. Renaming the fact table to ‘Sales’ fixed this.
  • Setting synonyms. Unsurprisingly, this had a big impact on usability in the same way that changing the table and column names did. I found that I had to go through several iterations of uploading the data, writing questions, seeing what worked and what didn’t, and adding more synonyms before I had a set that I was happy with; I can imagine that in the real world you’d need to round up several end users and lock them in a room to see how they phrased their questions so as to get a really good list of synonyms for them.
  • Setting Power View-related properties. This included setting the Default Field Set on a table, so I only saw a few important fields in a meaningful order when Q&A returned a table result; and also Summarize By so that Q&A didn’t try to aggregate year values. All of this makes sense given how closely-related Q&A and Power View are, but even though I had a reasonably ‘finished’ model to start off with I still hadn’t set all of these properties because I knew I was never going to try to sum up a year column.
  • Adding new columns. There were a number of cases where I realised that I, as a human user, was able to make assumptions about the data that Q&A could not. For example the source data records sales of four different types of residential property: terraced, detached, semi-detached and flat. The first three are types of house, but the source data doesn’t actually state that they are types houses anywhere so in order to see the total number of sales of houses I had to add another column to explicitly define which property types were houses.
  • Disambiguation. Probably the most irritating thing about the Bing geocoding service that Power View and Q&A use is the way it always chooses a US location when you give it an ambiguous place name. Therefore when looking at sales by town I would see the town name “Bristol” show up on the map as Bristol, Tennessee (population 24,821) rather than Bristol in England (population 416,400). Creating a new column with town name and country concatenated stopped this happening.

The Microsoft blog post I referenced above announcing Q&A promises that a more detailed guide to configuring models for Q&A will be published soon, which is good news. The important point to take away from this, though, is that even the most polished Power Pivot models will need additional tweaks and improvements in order to get the best out of Q&A.

The big question remains, though, whether Q&A will be something that end users actually get some value from. As a not-very-scientific test of this I handed my laptop over to my wife (who has no experience of BI tools but who has a healthy interest in property prices) to see how easy it was for her to use, and straight away she was able to write queries and find the information she was looking for, more or less. There were a still few cases where Q&A and/or my model failed, such as when she searched for “average house price in Amersham” – the model has a measure for “average price”, it knows about the property type “house” and the town “Amersham”, but “average house price” confused it and the query had to be rewritten as “average price of a house in Amersham”. Overall, though, I was pleasantly surprised and as a result I’m rather less sceptical than I was about Q&A’s usefulness, even if I’m still not 100% convinced yet.

Written by Chris Webb

December 23, 2013 at 12:45 am

Posted in Cloud, Excel, Power BI, Q&A

Ordering Of Named Sets In Excel

with 3 comments

A bit of an obscure one, this, but it’s come up twice this week so worth mentioning. When you define a named set on your SSAS Multidimensional cube, Excel doesn’t respect the order of items in that set by default when you use it in a PivotTable. Consider the following named set defined on the Adventure Works cube (on the Calculations tab of the cube, not in defined in Excel itself):

CREATE SET [MY COUNTRIES] AS
{[Customer].[Country].&[France], [Customer].[Country].&[Canada], [Customer].[Country].&[Australia]};

Note that the countries are in the order France, Canada, Australia. When you use this named set in Excel, this order is overridden and the countries come out in hierarchy order, that’s to say the order that they appear on the Country hierarchy: Australia, Canada, France.

image 

image

How can you stop this? After all, in a lot of cases the order of members in a named set is important. If you have Excel 2010 or Excel 2013 (I believe this option isn’t available in Excel 2007), you need to click on the name of the set in the PivotTable Field List pane and select Field Settings:

image

Then in the Field Settings dialog go to the Layout and Print tab and uncheck the “Automatically order and remove duplicates from the set” option:

image

When you do that, the order of your set is respected:

image

Written by Chris Webb

July 31, 2013 at 2:12 pm

Some Thoughts About Power BI

with 51 comments

By now you’ll probably have seen the Power BI announcement from Microsoft. It’s an important one, and if you haven’t seen it I suggest you take a look at the official announcements and website here:

http://blogs.office.com/b/office-news/archive/2013/07/08/announcing-power-bi-for-office-365.aspx
http://blogs.office.com/b/office365tech/archive/2013/07/07/what-powers-power-bi-in-office-365.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2013/07/08/introducing-power-bi-for-office-365.aspx?WT.mc_id=Social_TW_OutgoingEvents_20130708_25941_SQLServer
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/excel/power-bi-FX104080667.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/powerbi/archive/2013/07/07/getting-started-with-pq-and-pm.aspx

Andrew Brust also has a good summary of the news here:
http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-announces-power-bi-for-office-365-7000017746/

There’s no point me repeating what’s already been said, so I thought I’d post my initial reaction to it:

  • Proper Mobile BI! HTML 5 Power View! It works on iPads too! Hurray! At-bloody-last! The mobile BI solution will allow you to find, interact with and share “Excel and Power View content”, so I guess that includes Excel worksheets (with PivotTables, slicers etc) as well as Power View reports (a close look at the screenshots in the blog posts above back this up).
  • Making Power BI available only via Office 365 is going to be a very controversial strategy in the MS BI partner community. To be clear: as far as I understand it, Data Explorer (now Power Query), GeoFlow (now Power Map), mobile BI and all of the cool stuff that’s just been announced is only going to be available through Power BI, and therefore Office 365. Unfortunately the biggest companies, with the biggest BI budgets, are often the ones who are slowest to upgrade to the latest versions of Office and a lot of cases this won’t change just because someone wants to see their reports on an iPad. Where IT department inertia, worries about data privacy and company politics mean that Office 365 is not an option, Microsoft will lose out to the pure-play BI vendors who offer standalone solutions.
  • If you look at this from a different point of view, though, some of the things that I (as a BI Pro) feel least comfortable about in Microsoft’s BI strategy are also its greatest strengths. The way I see it, MS is not treating self-service BI as a solution in its own right, but selling self-service BI as a feature of Office. This makes a lot of sense from Microsoft’s point of view – it’s building on the fact that Excel is the tool of choice for data analysis for 99% of users. What I think is going to happen as a result of this is that, rather than partners selling BI as a standalone solution as in the past, we’re going to be talking to people who have already got Office 2013 or Office 365 and are looking to make the most of the BI features that come as part of that. The MS BI partner community is going to have to adjust to this because I doubt MS is going to change this strategy soon.
  • The same can be said of the Office 365-only strategy. If Microsoft is going to be successful with its cloud-first strategy then it’s going to have to prioritise cloud functionality over on-prem functionality. I think MS is doing the right thing with its cloud-first strategy, so therefore, even though I’m going to find it painful when I have to deal with customers that won’t or can’t move to Office 365, I can understand why MS is making Power BI Office 365 only. Beyond the hype (MS says that 1 in 4 of its customers is already on Office 365), it does seem like the uptake of Office 365 is quite strong, especially in SMBs, so hopefully there will be a large potential customer base.
  • I’ve been presenting sessions on the Excel 2013 BI stack at various user groups and conferences over the last few months and it’s gone down very well indeed. A lot of people have come up to me after seeing my session and said that they had been looking at QlikView and Tableau for BI, and would now consider Office 2013 as another alternative. The BI functionality on its own is pretty good, and good enough for a lot of customers even if it isn’t as mature as some of the competing offerings; the fact that the BI functionality comes baked into Office is the killer. While it may be expensive to upgrade to Office 2013/Office 365 this is a cost that many businesses will be considering anyway regardless of their BI requirements; you also have to compare this with the cost of QlikView and Tableau licenses and remember that not every user will need the most expensive SKUs of Office 2013.
  • The ability to refresh data in Excel workbooks deployed to Sharepoint Online, even when the data sources are on-prem, is a key feature and one that I’ve been waiting for. I wonder what the performance will be like?
  • For anyone of a certain age, the first reaction to the news of the natural language querying capability is two words: English Query. I haven’t played with it so I can’t pass judgement, but it’s going to have to be pretty impressive if anyone is going to use it for more than just sales demos. We shall see…
  • I am quite curious about the enterprise data search capabilities. Leaving aside the ability to query them in natural language, the ability to search for data across the enterprise will be useful. I think this is what happened to Project Barcelona.
  • Similarly, it seems as though this search capability is going to be significantly expanded on the public internet. At the moment, in Data Explorer Power Query we’ve seen the ability to query Wikipedia for data. Being able to query many other public data in the same way will be very powerful. There are a number of sites like Quandl that already make public datasets very easy to find and download, and the new search and query capabilities could leapfrog them.
  • No announcement on pricing has been made as yet. Please, please be ridiculously cheap!
  • We don’t have a date for the preview yet, but if you sign up here you’ll be notified when it’s available. It’s meant to be coming “later this summer”.

UPDATE: Some more things to add…

  • Something I didn’t pick up on at the time, but which emerged on Twitter later, is that PowerPivot has had a name change: it’s now Power Pivot with a space, to make it consistent with PowerV View and so on. This might seem minor, but for those of us who write books and have to sweat these details, it’s quite important!
  • I sense I’ve hurt a few feelings at MS with my comments on the natural language query. Let me be clear about my position here: I’ve not played with it, so I can’t pass judgement yet. I can imagine that natural language search for data will work well, but I will be very, very impressed if natural language query works well enough to be used on real data by real users. Real data is dirty and complex and user expectations will be very high and easily dashed. My guess is that the main issue will be that users can’t distinguish between what is a query and what is a calculation, and while the product can probably do queries well (eg “Show me the sales of widgets this year”) it may struggle with calculations (eg “Show me the customer churn by month this year”). But as I said, we shall see.

Finally, and as always, I reread this post this morning and worried that I sound too negative when in fact I’m very positive overall. To summarize:

  • The fact this is is all in Office and specifically Excel = the killer feature.
  • Mobile BI = good, even if it’s very late.
  • Power Query = very, very, very good indeed. I love it already and I think it’s going to be as big, if not bigger than Power Pivot. Power BI is worth buying for this alone.
  • Office 365 requirement = a problem for some customers, maybe, but understandable from Microsoft’s point of view.
  • Cloud requirement = again, a problem for some, but understandable and a big advantage for SMEs who can’t afford the cost of hardware and time to configure Sharepoint on-prem. The ability to refresh in the cloud from on-prem data sources is the key feature here.
  • Power Map = OK. Useful for customers who need geographic analysis, but it’s main use is that it’s great for demos (and this should not be underestimated – all products need some wow).
  • Power View goes HTML5 = relief. The Silverlight dependency undermined its credibility no end.
  • Natural language search for data sources = potentially very useful.
  • Natural language query of those data sources = see above. I remain to be convinced.
  • Data stewardship features = I haven’t seen enough of these to be able to comment.

More blog posts worth reading on this subject:
http://www.jenunderwood.com/blog.htm#O365PowerBI
http://www.jenstirrup.com/2013/07/power-business-intelligence-for.html

UPDATE #2: even more things to add…!

You can see the video of Amir’s demo from WPC here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsa-5LGx_IY&feature=youtu.be

Some more details (which should be accurate) from a friend of mine at the conference:

  • The Power View standalone app is still Silverlight based, it’s only the mobile app that uses HTML5
  • Power Query queries can be shared between users via BI Sites, but the execution of these queries always takes place in desktop Excel. Queries will appear in searches when they’re published to a BI Site.
  • Excel workbooks connected to on-prem SSAS (Tabular and Multidimensional) will also be refreshable from a BI Site
  • Natural Language queries (what I think is being called “Q&A”) will also work against SSAS Tabular models. The Categorization property that’s in the Advanced tab in the PowerPivot window, and also in SSDT, is partly used to help Q&A do this.
  • External users can be given access to reports in BI Sites.
  • There will be a “Data Steward Portal” which will help you monitor who is doing what on your BI Site.
  • No comment on when this will arrive in Sharepoint on-prem. My feeling is that MS have no plans to do this at all, or maybe will only do it if a lot of people complain…?

Written by Chris Webb

July 8, 2013 at 5:10 pm

Sharing Data From Excel as OData with FlatMerge

with 9 comments

At last, the Excel 2013 app I’ve really been waiting for! Those data visualization apps from last week have generated a lot of interest, but this is even cooler for a data geek like me.

A few months ago I came across FlatMerge, a startup that allows you to upload data and then make it available as an OData feed; I was going to blog about it but my fellow OData fan Jamie Thomson beat me to it. However at that point it was only a website where you could upload data… today, FlatMerge released its own, free (for the time being) Excel 2013 app which allows you to upload data direct from Excel. So you can take data from an Excel table:

image

Save it to FlatMerge:

image

And then import it into Excel 2013, PowerPivot, Data Explorer or any tool that supports OData feeds. Here’s the URL for the table I just uploaded (which, if I’ve read the docs correctly, should be publicly available):

https://fmsecure.azurewebsites.net/Data/oData/a5462e03-e0bc-44b4-a654-5dbbbd59cb59

It’s still a version 1.0 and there are a few features it’s missing that I’d like to see (like the ability to update a data source, and to control who has access to that data), but I think it’s very cool. I’ve seen tools that allow you to share data from Excel before but this is the first that uses OData, and this means you have a much greater degree of flexibility about how you consume your data. Arguably you could do the same thing by saving your Excel file to Sharepoint 2013 Excel Services and using the OData feed from an Excel Services table, but that’s a much more expensive and less user-friendly option.

I can imagine a whole bunch of uses for this, for example in a budgeting application where multiple Excel users need to submit their figures, which then need to be consolidated in a single Excel spreadsheet, maybe using Data Explorer.

Written by Chris Webb

May 30, 2013 at 6:42 am

Posted in Cloud, Excel

Tagged with

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,146 other followers